«Divinity Original Sin» tegen «Divinity: Original Sin Enhanced Edition»: wie heeft gewonnen?

If it helps, then, of course, please. You could have not asked...

Well said! With your permission, may I use this quote in my article?

From the perspective of plot integrity — yes. Although, in my opinion, this is more the story of Sarevok — it begins with him (in the video — on the roof) and ends with his demise. Meanwhile, the story of the Heir continues. In this regard, again — personally for me, the second game resembles an expansion like "Awakening" for "Dragon Age: Origins" or "Shadows of Undrentide"/"Hordes of the Underdark" for "Neverwinter Nights", which, serving as a sort of continuation, were included in the main game. I wouldn't claim that this is true for "Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn", but that impression may arise. Based on this impression, I believe that considering the first and second Baldur as one game wouldn't be such a bad thought. But I'm not insisting...
The game itself (BG III) — yes, it creates the impression of being stuffed to the brim (and not always with what's needed), and taking into account the developers' recognition (that they had to significantly hack their ideas with scissors... and likely — garden ones) — it's hardly misleading.
And the graphics... I cannot say anything good here — for me, modern graphics are cumbersome and too demanding (and the more modern, the greedier). I remember "Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic" — Manaan. The endless water surface... and the sun... Or Korriban — the valley of the Dark Lords. Static, beautiful, and no ray tracing. At some point, the visuals in games stopped getting prettier — only more detailed. And beauty, in my humble opinion, does not depend on detail but on the artist's skills. Ancient artists knew how to create beauty from pixels.

The first completed on its own: the iron crisis is resolved, the bandits are destroyed, the organizers of the crisis are punished; the hero learned who he is and where he comes from, found a sister - everything is good.

Good luck with the article!
Although the first Baldur may not withstand such a comparison... It would be helpful to showcase the first and second (together they have the look of a completed game) against the third Baldur. This way, there would be a much greater chance of the desired outcome.

I agree, it's a nightmare! I really regret not letting Shadowheart kill the aasimar - how was I to know?!
The graphics are wildly distracting with their brightness: you can't disable either shadows or wind.
And why do we need to show NPCs so closely during every dialogue?
In general, I'm plodding through the game very slowly and working on a critical article comparing the first and third.

Well, I didn't like the cube. I like excessive graphics.
https://core-rpg.net/articles/crpgs/baldurs_gate/baldurs-gate-3-xanathar But this is a nightmare!

As it is in terms of mechanics and excessive graphics - BG3 really would have been better off not existing.

If it weren't for D:OS2, there wouldn't be BG3. In my opinion, BG3 > D:OS2.

И вновь золотые слова!
Я осознанно упомянул Fallout 2. Отлично очищает сознание от новомодной шелухи, приводит в порядок вкусы.

Сравнение, пожалуй, не совсем корректное.
Второй Фол - это классика, игра настолько высока, что рядом нельзя поставить ничего.
На счёт графики ДОС согласен: играю на минималках, зачем нужны тени от деревьев и прочая мелочь, понапрасну загружающая систему - не понимаю.

Divinity: Original Sin уступает Fallout 2 лично для меня. D:OS — несерьёзный сюжет, мультипликационная графика.

Обложка - как раз меньшее зло. Впрочем, некоторые на полном серьёзе утверждают, что игру улучшили.

Они обложку изуродовали в EE, на мой вкус — плохой знак.

Спасибо!